the Bombay High Court said. The case pertains to the ownership and usage of the Lodha brand. Macrotech had filed a suit saying that the brand “Lodha” was a trademark and no one else could use it.

Bombay High Court fined the Enforcement Directorate (ED) Rs 1 lakh for misusing legal proceedings by turning a civil dispute into a criminal case. The court mentioned that the ED acted with ...

The Bombay High Court has stayed an order by the Bar Council of India (BCI) suspending the license of a Mumbai-based female advocate following a complaint filed by some members of the Advocate ...

Bombay High Court directed the state to curb noise pollution from places of worship, stating that loudspeaker use is not an essential part of any religion. The court emphasized public health and ...

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has paved the way for eligible taxpayers to claim the rebate under Section 87A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2024-25 and beyond. A bench of ...

In her petition, Singh argued that the society’s billing practice contravened a Bombay high court order stating that there is absolutely no rational basis for a society to charge maintenance as ...

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday said that central agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate must stop harassing citizens and conduct themselves within the framework of the law. Justice Milind ...

The Lodha brothers were urged to settle the trademark row through mediation, as the Bombay High Court highlighted familial ...

The Bombay High Court has issued a notification for the recruitment of 129 clerk posts. The application process for these ...

The Bombay High Court has released the official notification for Clerk Recruitment 2025, announcing 129 vacancies. This is a great opportunity for aspiring candidates in one of India’s most ...

The Bombay High Court fined the Enforcement Directorate Rs 1 lakh for turning a civil dispute into a criminal case with money laundering charges. The court also fined the complainant, Gul Achhra, for ...

The court found that the society's practice violated a Bombay High Court order and went against a statutory order issued by the Maharashtra government in 2000. The Co-operative Court passed this ...